A selected group of symposium participants, representing Christian political parties, trade-unions and artists organisations debated for two more days (November 28 and 29) in Rotterdam, and analysed the results of the four Brainstorm Papers. Here are the results.
1. Political
Currently a new legal order and democracy are developing in Europe. The intention of establishing the European Community is deeply founded on the commission of protecting basic classical and social human rights to the full advantage of people.
National governments do not have sufficient resources to deal with cross border problems or work on (international) peace plans in which basic classical and social human rights are protected. This is why it would be desirable to establish higher authorities to which democratically controlled power and resources would be granted. The Eurpean Community could be such an authority within the framework of a federation, i.e. with powers delegated to it by the member powers on the basis of majority decisions.
The idea of a federation opposes the confederative or intergovernmental alternative, where member states keep areas of control to themselves and make decisions based on consensus. The main objection to this intergovernmental alternative is that, shoul it become necessary, there is no higher authority to appeal to. European democracy needs a fullbodied parliamentary democracy in which, with the proper authority, the European Parliament can enforce resolutions taken at the Ministers' Council. These reolutions should enhance the responsibilities of national and regional governments. This is also known as the 'subsidiarity' principle and mainly deals with the vertical dimension of this concept the hierarchical relation between 'higher' and 'lower' governing bodies. But Europe cannot solely exist on the basis of a politically developed democracy. It also needs a clear social basis, such as active social organizations (social 'midfield') with specific responsibilities which a European government should respect. This would be known as the horizontal subsidiarity principle and be a principle which is contrary to political centralism in which a government monopolises all the responsibilities for a society.
The Christian Artists Association
The Christian Artists Association operates in the social midfield, an area of action for ordinary citizens to be involved in.
'Christian Artists' provides a meeting point for artists from all over Europe and desires, from a Christian inspiration, to contribute substantially to European culture, historically marked by Christian and humanistic motives. 'Christian Artists' is actively involved in relating to and dialoging with other artists- and social organizations.
The Association considers it its political responsibility to address governments on their responsibilities to maintain the freedom of expression of artists and adequate provisions for art in society in general. Europe cannot exist without a beating cultural heart. Artists are at the core of that heart. 'Christian Artists' would like to see the European Community contribute to developing networks of artists (organizations) as well as supportive measures in order to make a flourishing European cultural life possible. Furthermore, 'Christian Artists' thinks that the Community should take up the task of supporting those regions and member states that have insufficient means to support their own artists and develop their arts.
'Christian Artists' presents itself as a European trade-union desiring to take part in discussions at European forums on developments relating to:
This also involves issues such as:
2. Social responsibility
Artists bear a social responsibility for the society in which they live and conversely, society bears a responsibility for its artists. This makes it already clear that there needs to be a signed social paragraph per nation in the EC. Part of that should be the recognition and regulation of the profession of artists.
One of the most important conclusions is that in order to fulfil their unique role within the shaping of civilisation, artists need to organize themselves. Being organized enables them to participate in the decision making process. Becoming a member of an artists organisation also encourages solidarity between artists.
A few points to consider:
a) Governments/EC/society's social responsibilities
b) What should artists do?
3. Artistic freedom
A basic right for every human being is the right to express oneself. This freedom must allow for the right framework for all persons, of any. race, religious or political conviction, to express, in their chosen style of artfrom, any opinion or belief, except when this is done at the expence of other human rights, and without being discriminated against. This basic right should be supported by government and non-government bodies so that artists have the opportunity to enrich personal lives and society.
4. Education
Education about our culture, its roots and the history of art is essential for people to develop a harmonious cultural personality and become civilised members of the European Community.
Governments should impose minimum standards of creative teaching in primary and secondary schools in order to develop early artistic intelligence and creativity. Besides this, there is a clear need for education in the history of one's culture and its relationship with other cultural (minority) groups.
5a. The international association of Christian Artists should continue
5b. Arts-organisations
Arts councils often appear one-sided in the way in which they distribute funds. It is felt that the community should have an involvement in arts-councils policies and that the members of such councils should truly represent all art-forms, styles and expressions.
It seems that too often the same kind of people are elected on the arts-councils, thereby turning them into elitist groupings.
As a result the arts-councils often spend money on elitist projects, instead of investing in a diversity of art forms, styles and artists. This situation needs to change.